RidgeNoteRidgeNote
Start HerePack BuilderCompare GearGuidesBest ofHuntingGear Lists
ProShakedown
RidgeNoteRidgeNote

Know your carry. Backpacking gear on the makers' own figures, with the source shown where we have one: build your pack and check it before you go.

Get the Field Dispatch

One email a month: gear newly on record, any change to a maker's own list price, and one field note.

Gear

  • Tents & Shelters
  • Sleeping Bags
  • Sleeping Pads
  • Backpacks
  • Insulated Jackets
  • Cook Systems
  • Hunting Gear
  • Best-of Lists

Explore

  • Pack Weight Calculator
  • How Much Should a Pack Weigh?
  • Compare Gear
  • The Shakedown
  • Backpacking Checklist
  • Fuel Calculator
  • Water Carry Calculator
  • Start Here
  • Backpacking Gear Lists
  • Gear by Brand
  • Buying Guides
  • The Field Dispatch
  • Open Gear Data

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Disclosure
  • Terms

© 2026 RidgeNote. Some links are affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

BrowsePackSaved
Gear / Backpacks & Packs

Seek Outside Goshawk 6300 vs Stone Glacier Solo 3600

Solo 3600 is the lighter of the two by 51 g (1.8 oz).

Goshawk 6300 lists for $4.00 less at the manufacturer's price.

Where to buy

Goshawk 6300

  • Check price at Seek Outside

Solo 3600

  • Check price at Stone Glacier

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Weights and prices are the manufacturer’s published figures. The lower weight and the higher R-value are highlighted.

Goshawk 6300

Seek Outside

Solo 3600

Stone Glacier

Weight
68.0 oz
66.2 oz
MSRP
$671.00
$675.00

Which one to choose

  • Choose the Stone Glacier Solo 3600 if every ounce counts — 66.2 oz against 68.0 oz.
+ Add the Goshawk 6300 to my pack+ Add the Solo 3600 to my pack

Questions this comparison answers

Is the Seek Outside Goshawk 6300 lighter than the Stone Glacier Solo 3600?
Solo 3600 is the lighter of the two by 51 g (1.8 oz).
Which has the lower list price, the Seek Outside Goshawk 6300 or the Stone Glacier Solo 3600?
Goshawk 6300 lists for $4.00 less in manufacturer list price (MSRP).

Seek Outside Goshawk 6300

Source not recorded.

“The Goshawk 6300 is big enough for a 7 to 10 day trip in cold weather, but compresses into a tight daypack using our gatekeeper compression straps. Featuring two tall side pockets, and a two way side zipper access with rolltop closure, the Goshawk has simple organization and is highly water resistant. The included Top Lid and Talon System help to round out your organizational needs.”
Full specs and prices for the Goshawk 6300 →

Stone Glacier Solo 3600

Source not recorded.

“We have improved our best selling small capacity hunting pack by adding an integrated differential cut spotting scope pocket. This pack is the ideal minimalist multi-day pack that is the perfect combination of capability and versatility. An ultralight backpack using no ultralight materials, it is capable of 150 pound plus loads and expandable to 6,000 plus cubic inches. The Solo weighs 4 lb 9 oz.”
Full specs and prices for the Solo 3600 →

Ranked guides for this shelf

  • What Is the Lightest Backpacking Pack in 2026?

The next question

  • Atmos AG 65 Backpack vs Goshawk 6300
  • Baltoro 65 vs Goshawk 6300
  • Gorilla 50 vs Mariposa 60 Backpack
  • Atmos AG 65 Backpack vs Exos 48
  • Causeway 28L - Asphalt vs Sweetwater UL 28L - S | M
  • Baltoro 65 vs Sky 5900
Add a third item to this comparison·All backpacks on the register